• Users Online: 429
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 81-85

Assessment of nickel release from various dental appliances used routinely in pediatric dentistry


Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, People's Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication24-Jun-2016

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Parimala Kulkarni
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, People's Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0975-962X.184649

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Context: The use of nickel-containing alloys in dentistry has been questioned because of the biological liabilities of nickel and the release of nickel ions from dental appliances into the oral cavity. The potential health hazards of nickel and chromium and their compounds have been the focus of attention for more than 100 years. It has established that these metals could cause hypersensitivity. Aims: To assess the nickel release from various dental appliances used in pediatric dentistry. Settings and Design: It is a in vitro study. Materials and Methods: The study was undertaken to analyze in vitro biodegradation of space maintainers and stainless steel crowns made out of stainless steel materials from different manufacturers. The leaching effect simulating the use of clinical practice was studied by keeping the respective number of Stainless Steel Crowns and space maintainers in the artificial saliva incubating at 37°C and analyzing for nickel release after 1,7,14,21 and 28 days using atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Statistical Analysis: The results were statistically analyzed by using One way ANOVA and repeated measures of ANOVA was applied at different time intervals i.e. 1,7,14,21,28 days. The critical value for statistical significance was set at P = 0.05. Results: Results showed that there was measurable release of nickel which reached maximum level at the end of 7 days which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The release of nickel and chromium very much below when compared with the average dietary intake of nickel (200-300 ppm/day) which were not capable of causing any toxic effects.

Keywords: Allergic reaction, nickel, nickel sensitivity


How to cite this article:
Kulkarni P, Agrawal S, Bansal A, Jain A, Tiwari U, Anand A. Assessment of nickel release from various dental appliances used routinely in pediatric dentistry. Indian J Dent 2016;7:81-5

How to cite this URL:
Kulkarni P, Agrawal S, Bansal A, Jain A, Tiwari U, Anand A. Assessment of nickel release from various dental appliances used routinely in pediatric dentistry. Indian J Dent [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Sep 21];7:81-5. Available from: http://www.ijdentistry.com/text.asp?2016/7/2/81/184649


  Introduction Top


In dentistry, nickel (Ni) is used for fabrication of space maintainers, brackets, fillings, and crowns.[1] However, in oral cavity, it is subjected to biodegradation due to its ionic, thermal, microbiological, and enzymatic properties. Advantages of Ni and chromium alloys, being its high strength, corrosion resistance, and relatively low cost, have led to their common use. This has raised questions concerning their biological safety. Burrows after his study in 1986 revealed that Ni is by far the most common agent to cause sensitization due to their leaching in saliva from dental appliances.[2] Ni is a constituent of many alloys used in dental treatment to provide improved physical and chemical properties, such as durability and strength, as well as it reduces the cost of using precious alloys. The amount of Ni in dental alloys ranges from traces to over 60%. This alloy contains 11.5–27% chromium and 7–22% Ni. In relation to pediatric dentistry, Ni ions are released by stainless crowns, space maintainers, and orthodontic appliances over time in patient saliva. This has been seen to increase after tooth brush abrasion and increase in the oral pH.[3]

Ni is one of the most potent allergens and ubiquitous contact allergen among children and adolescents.[4] The most common mechanisms of adverse reactions induced by Ni are (a) corrosion, which depends on the presence of oxygen, chlorides, and non-noble metal alloys in the saliva and (b) the continuous and gradual release of ions from dental material. Such ionic components are absorbed in the human body, either through the oral mucosa, digestive system, skin, or airways.[5] The most frequent adverse reactions caused are hypersensitivity, sub-toxic reactions, metal toxicity, and allergic contact dermatitis. Symptoms of allergic reactions of Ni containing alloys, i.e., seeing commonly are severely inflamed hyperplastic gingival tissue surrounding crowns or space maintainers, alveolar bone loss and edema of gums, palate, and throat.

Recent studies have proven the carcinogenic effects of Ni through exposure pathways such as inhalation, ingestion, and parenteral injection of Ni compounds.[6] Because of its wide use in dentistry, it is important to assess the amount of Ni release from various dental materials.

Aim

The aim of this study is to assess the Ni release from various dental appliances used in pediatric dentistry.

Objectives

  • To measure the Ni ion release from conventional preformed stainless steel crowns (SSCs)
  • To determine the maximum no of appliances that can be given to an individual without reaching the toxic levels.



  Materials and Methods Top


A total number of 90 were studied out of which 45 were SSCs classified as Group A [Figure 1] and the other 45 were space maintainer [Figure 2] classified as Group B were studied. Each group was further divided into three subgroups [Table 1]A.
Figure 1: Stainless steel crown

Click here to view
Figure 2: Space maintainer

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view


Initially, the internal surface of crowns was filled with polycarboxylate cement [Figure 3] to prevent contact with artificial saliva and then after being fully set, they were placed into the saliva sample [Figure 4] and [Figure 5].
Figure 3: Crown filled with cement

Click here to view
Figure 4: Crown in artificial saliva

Click here to view
Figure 5: Space maintainer in artificial saliva

Click here to view


Subgroups were maintained separately in closed polyethylene jar containing 20 ml of artificial saliva (synthetic saliva with a pH of 6.43 ± 0.26 consisting of: 0.8 g NaCl, 2.4 g KCl, 1.5 g NaH2 PO4, 0.1 g Na2S, and 2 g CO[NH2]2) [Figure 6] in an incubator at 37°C for 4 weeks [Figure 7]. The samples were placed in the solution on day 0. After day 1 and every 7 days, they were taken out from the solution and placed in another container with fresh saliva in order to avoid saturation of solution with released ions. All samples were shaken gently during immersion, to ensure bathing all crowns in saliva, and to obtain a uniform solution. The amounts of released Ni were measured on days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28. The graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Varian SpectrAA 220FS Spectrophotometer*) was used for quantitative assessment of released Ni [Figure 8]. Ni standard solution (100 mg/ml) was prepared through dissolving Ni nitrate in deionized water. Thinner solutions were prepared on daily basis by diluting the standard solution for calibration of the device. Ni level of each sample was determined twice, and the concentration of Ni below detectable level was considered zero.
Figure 6: Artificial saliva used (International Cast Polymer Alliance)

Click here to view
Figure 7: Incubator

Click here to view
Figure 8: Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometer

Click here to view


Data analysis

The results were statistically analyzed by using one-way ANOVA for inter-subgroup comparison and repeated-measures ANOVA was applied for the various intra-subgroup comparisons at different time intervals, i.e., 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The critical value for statistical significance was set at P = 0.05.


  Results Top


On assessing the ppm levels of Ni in saliva of SSC groups, we found that the release of Ni ions from SSC subgroup 3 (Pyrex) was significantly more than that from SSC subgroup 1 (3M) and SSC subgroup 2 (Kidodent) at the 1st, 7th, and 14th days. No significant difference was found in Ni release between SSC subgroup 1 (3M) and SSC subgroup 2 (Kidodent). The rate of Ni release was maximum on the 1st day and after that it gradually decreased till 28 days in all three subgroups [Table 1]B and [Table 2].
Table 2: Inter-subgroup comparison by post hoc test of Group A

Click here to view


The release of Ni ions in the saliva of space maintainer group was found to be statistically significantly higher in SM subgroup 3 (Shree) as compared to SM subgroup 1 (dantaurum) and SM subgroup 2 (RMO). No Significant difference was found in Ni release between SM subgroup 1 (Dantaurum) and SM subgroup 2 (RMO). In all the cases, the release of Ni ions was maximum on the 7th day, thereafter it diminished with time [Table 3] and [Table 4].
Table 3: The mean release nickel on 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 in various subgroups of space maintainers

Click here to view
Table 4: Inter-subgroup comparison by post hoc test of Group B

Click here to view


Highest amount of Ni release was observed from subgroup 3 (Shree) in space maintainers i.e., 1.39 ppm and from subgroup 3 (Pyrex) in SSC, i.e., 0.6 ppm. However, these results are insignificant in terms of toxicity.


  Discussion Top


In pediatric dentistry, commonly used preformed SSCs and space maintainers are exposed to saliva in oral cavity, which is a potentially hostile environment, where electrochemical corrosion can occur.

The harmful effects of Ni its allergenicity, and its carcinogenicity have been systematically investigated at the cell, tissue, organ, and organism levels. Approximately 10% of the general population has a hypersensitive reaction to Ni. Peltonen in 1979 reported that girls are 10 times more sensitive to Ni than boys.[7]

In our study, Ni ion level (<5 ppm) were well below the critical value to produce toxicity (50 and 500 mg/kg body weight)[8] and below daily dietary intake level (200–300 µg/day). this finding is supported by Bhaskar et al.[9] and the WHO (1988 and 1991)[10] stated that 0.2 ppm/kg body weight of Ni can cause systemic manifestations.

To produce any mucosal allergic reactions, the antigen should be 5–12 times stronger than what is required to create an allergic reaction on the skin. The amount of Ni ion level found in our study is sufficient enough to induce an allergic reaction, due to high haptenic capacity of the released Ni ion, so it can cause allergic reactions in children. Haptens are small molecules that cannot trigger the immune system reactivity by themselves but hapten protein conjugates can act as a trigger to an allergic reaction. The conjugated haptens become antigens and induce the formation of antihapten antibodies. Even antibodies with specificity for metal ions such as Ni are produced in this way. This is supported by Ramazani et al.[11] However, Menek [12] et al. state that Ni ion cannot cause any allergic reactions in these concentrations.

The retrieval analyses are in vitro studies that examine in vivo aged samples. In an analysis of retrieved crowns by Eliades et al.,[13] no changes were seen in the composition of elements. This study indicated that neither Ni nor any other element could be released under clinical conditions and in other words the crowns are not prone to corrosion. They showed that clinical conditions revealed no Ni release from SSC's, which is in contrary to our results. Keinan et al. in 2010[14] analyzed the absorption of metal ions released from SSCs by root surface of primary molars. Higher amounts of Ni, chromium, and iron (5–6 times) were found in the cementum of molars covered with SSCs compared to intact molars. The differences between groups were highly significant (P < 0.001). This can be taken as an indication of biodegradation of NI from SSC's in oral environment. Similarly, Morán-Martínez et al. in 2013[5] determined both the genotoxicity of Ni in buccal epithelial cells and the urinary excretion of Ni in 37 children with metal crowns and suggest that odontological exposure to metal crowns results in genotoxic damage at the cellular level of the oral mucosa and an increase in the urinary excretion of Ni within 45 days of exposure. The most recent study was done by Ramazani et al. in 2014,[11] and the results were similar to our study.

In this study, the space maintainers showed higher Ni ion release than the SCCs this may be because of the solder used and also because of the heat used for soldering, and the same results were reported by Grimsdottir et al.[15]


  Conclusion Top


  • In case with history of Ni sensitivity, an alternate alloy should be recommended and a patch test could be performed before selecting Ni containing alloys
  • From this study, we can conclude that restoring up to eight primary teeth with SCCs and four space maintainers cannot cause toxicity in terms of salivary Ni release
  • If the stainless steel coated with proprietary material is used for fabricating crowns, it might decrease the ion release and perhaps prevent various health hazards in children.


Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Bass JK, Fine H, Cisneros GJ. Nickel hypersensitivity in the orthodontic patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:280-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Burrows D. Hypersensitivity to mercury, nickel and chromium in relation to dental materials. Int Dent J 1986;36:30-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Wataha JC, Lockwood PE, Khajotia SS, Turner R. Effect of pH on element release from dental casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:691-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Byer TT, Morrell DS. Periumbilical allergic contact dermatitis: Blue jeans or belt buckles? Pediatr Dermatol 2004;21:223-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Morán-Martínez J, Monreal-de Luna KD, Betancourt-Martínez ND, Carranza-Rosales P, Contreras-Martínez JG, López-Meza MC, et al. Genotoxicity in oral epithelial cells in children caused by nickel in metal crowns. Genet Mol Res 2013;12:3178-85.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kasprzak KS, Sunderman FW Jr., Salnikow K. Nickel carcinogenesis. Mutat Res 2003;533:67-97.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Peltonen L. Nickel sensitivity in the general population. Contact Dermatitis 1979;5:27-32.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Vreeburg KJ, de Groot K, von Blomberg M, Scheper RJ. Induction of immunological tolerance by oral administration of nickel and chromium. J Dent Res 1984;63:124-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Bhaskar V, Subba Reddy VV. Biodegradation of nickel and chromium from space maintainers: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2010;28:6-12.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
10.
Cempel M, Nikel G. Nickel: A review of its sources and environmental toxicology. Polish J Environ Stud 2006;15:375-82.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ramazani N, Ahmadi R, Darijani M. Assessment of nickel release from stainless steel crowns. J Dent (Tehran) 2014;11:328-34.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Menek N, Başaran S, Karaman Y, Ceylan G, Tunç ES. Investigation of nickel ion release from stainless steel crowns by square wave voltammetry. Int J Electrochem Sci 2012;2:6465-71.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Eliades T, Zinelis S, Papadopoulos MA, Eliades G, Athanasiou AE. Nickel content of as-received and retrieved NiTi and stainless steel archwires: Assessing the nickel release hypothesis. Angle Orthod 2004;74:151-4.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Keinan D, Mass E, Zilberman U. Absorption of nickel, chromium, and iron by the root surface of primary molars covered with stainless steel crowns. Int J Dent 2010;2010:326124.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Grimsdottir MR, Gjerdet NR, Hensten-Pettersen A. Composition and in vitro corrosion of orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:525-32.  Back to cited text no. 15
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]


This article has been cited by
1 Tribo-corrosion characterization of NiTiCu alloy for bio-implant applications
Neeraj Sharma,Gurpreet Singh,Hussien Hegab,Mozammel Mia,Neel Kamal Batra
Materials Research Express. 2019; 6(9): 096526
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Effects of Restoring the Primary Dentition with Stainless-Steel Crowns on Children’s Salivary Nickel and Chromium Levels, and the Associations with Saliva pH: a Preliminary Before-After Clinical Trial
Leila Basir,Razieh Meshki,Azam Behbudi,Vahid Rakhshan
Biological Trace Element Research. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 ALLERGIC REACTIONS IN ORAL AND PERIORAL DISEASES - WHAT DO ALLERGY SKIN TEST RESULTS SHOW?
J Budimir,M Mravak-Stipetic,V Bulat,I Fercek,I Japundžic,L Lugovic-Mihic
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1710    
    Printed38    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded312    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]